


Open wide, you’ll feel much worse, I mean better, sorree, after this kicks in.
Reporting Scotland mental health nurse, Graham Stewart, administered today’s pro-anxiety dose at 06:27am, using the new Scotanx from Rechem. Scotanx is an exciting new product based on the Sovietanx psychotoxin used by Pravda and tailored to the needs of many of Reporting Scotland’s older viewers.
BBC Scotland Audience Counsel heads for Pacific Quay (c) cartoonsnap
Based on practice by BBC Charge Nurse McRatched, Scotanx has been found to be most effective when delivered in the early morning to reinforce the effects of the stress hormone cortisol.

Today’s dose has been increased in response to four recent sub-polls suggesting a surge in your SNP pressure reading. UK pollsters have been asked to monitor things carefully.
The dose consisted of 10-30ms of:
Some earlier reports from the Scottish Journal of PsychOps on BBC Scotland’s ‘We’re doing well out of the status quo so just vote No’ campaign:
The Power of Nightmares: Waking up to early morning bad news on BBC Scotland and fearing the unknown


Typically, Anglocentric, the Telegraph, in May 2018 missed any variations within these islands. A TuS reader prompted this report. See:


The two graphs tell the story clearly but what could explain these contrasting trends? The Telegraph was in no doubt:
‘Experts said a lack of basic checks was leading to hundreds of deaths in Britain, two in three of which could have been prevented with the right care.’
See this for evidence on treatment plans including regular tests:

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs25/documents/briefing-paper
Scots asthma sufferers seem significantly more likely to have a treatment plan in place than those in England. The situation in Labour Wales is very bad with less than a third being treated properly. What other factors might there be? See this:

Are some asthma sufferers in England choosing to eat rather than treat? The Express seems to think so:

The Express does not of course suggest that its readers stop voting Tory.

http://www.fdf.org.uk/news.aspx?article=8114
The above report: ‘UK Food and Drink Exports growth slow to a crawl in 2018’,
does not mention Scotland but the map below from the same site does, to dramatic effect:

http://www.fdf.org.uk/exports-2018-q4.aspx
Only the mostly rural South East compares. Every other part of England has a deficit.
With regard to growth, in Insider on March 15th 2019:
‘Value of whisky exports rises 7.8% as Scotland’s food and drink sold abroad brings in record £6.3 billion. Total exports increased by £293 million in 2018, a 4.9% rise, according to HMRC. Food exports have grown by 125% since 2007.’
https://www.insider.co.uk/news/value-whisky-exports-rises-78-14134882
Total UK food and drink exports for year ending 2018 were worth £16.4 billion.
http://www.fdf.org.uk/exports-2018-q3-data.aspx
So:

Yesterday’s Herald shunting the old ‘Scotrail is failing and the SNP government is failing to do enough about it’ story going. There is, of course, a wider, sunnier, picture and there are more up-to-date data. See, for example this, showing very high levels of reliability with 98.6% of all rural trains running and around 98% of all trains across the network running.

https://www.scotrail.co.uk/sites/default/files/assets/download_ct/web_upload_p12.pdf
With regard to punctuality, the real, current, news is one of improvement and not of supposed ‘chaos’. See this:

https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2019/02/scotrail-performance-reaches-new-high.html


Measles outbreaks increasing globally
We know it’s a monstrous story with measles outbreaks in the USA and falling uptake of the MMR vaccine in England heavily reported a big on BBC 1 News but in Scotland, important news is missed.
Despite ongoing controversy (see below) NHS Scotland has achieved 96.6% adoption of the one-dose MMR vaccine by 5 years-of-age and has now beaten the 95% target for ten years. The uptake in England is only 91.2% and falling.
Though some might worry about vaccine overload (see below), for BBC Scotland, I’m sure a target is a target and failure to hit any target is a crisis in NHS Scotland.
Note: There is almost 100% support for the MMR vaccine among professionals. See: https://www.nursinginpractice.com/article/%E2%80%98children%E2%80%99s-immune-systems-are-being-overloaded-all-these-vaccines%E2%80%99


Chapter 3 of the ONS review of the long run rates of relative poverty in UK households since 1961 shows that rate of poverty in 1961 was 13%. This rose sharply in the 1980s and 90s to peaks of 25%. After 1997 the poverty rates declined gently to 22% where it is now. The rise in poverty was caused by Thatcherism and coincided with Scotland’s health inequalities also rising sharply.
The ONS statistics are here p15 House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, Number 7096.
Child poverty was and is caused by policies of the UK government.
The effects of Thatcherism on rising income inequality, poverty and health inequalities can be found here
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5348/007970850fe7951c3aa4ca4e81891f23cb90.pdf
“The rises in cause-specific mortalities such as alcohol- and drug-related deaths, suicide and violence, and the widening health inequalities, occurred during the same time period in which unemployment, poverty and income inequality all rose. The antecedents of these types of cause-specific mortality, and of health inequalities, are well-explored in the literature; reviews of this evidence highlight the importance of social and economic determinants of health (79). Given what we know about the impact of Thatcher’s neoliberal reforms on the social and economic landscape of Britain, it seems clear that Thatcher’s legacy includes the unnecessary and unjust premature death of many British citizens, together with a substantial and continuing
burden of suffering and loss of well-being.”
The Scottish government has limited powers to tackle child poverty. It controls welfare spending amounting to about 15% and has little control over the economy. Control of these powers are needed to tackle inequalities of all kinds, particularly income and health inequalities

SNP at 45% so not quite as good as the two sub-polls from Opinium (13-15 March) with SNP at 51% and from Ipsos MORI (15-19 March) at 50% but pretty much the same as Opinium (20-22 March), at 46%, and still significantly up on the previous six, consistently putting them at 41%.
400 sampled giving SNP support at between 45% and 51% so well on the way to recouping many losses?
Interesting to note only Opinium suggesting Tories up at 25/26% in sharp contrast to YouGov and Ipsos MORI putting them at only 17% and 15% respectively.
By YouGov for the Times with 181 adults for 24th to 25th March:
By Opinium for the Observer with 118 adults for 20th to 22 March:
By Ipsos MORI with 91 adults for 15th to 19th of March, for all respondents:
Looking only at those certain to vote:
By Opinium for the Observer, 13th to 15th March, with 110 adults, online and with The Independent Group included:
Footnote: Still no sign of any pollster asking Scots how they would vote in Indyref2.

Drug rehab centre near Edinburgh
In the period from 1st October to 31st December to 31st December 2018:
The target is 90%.
In Scotland’s prisons 97.8% were seen within three weeks or less.
Click to access 2019-03-26-DATWT-Summary.pdf
For context, in England:



‘Only 3 of the country’s 42 senior football teams are in favour of clubs being punished for the misbehaviour of their fans.’
That’s the headline and above that, the results, when you ask the clubs if they think that they should be punished for the behaviour of those who have paid to get into property they own. Hmmm, let me think, how will they react? What’s that phrase about turkeys and Xmas, again?
We don’t know what the majority (25) think so we cannot say anything about them. We certainly can’t say, just to trigger feeling of righteous indignation, that only 3 are in favour. One or more of the others might be in favour but afraid that the big clubs hear of it.
This is research of uber-dummkopf quality with a hopeless research question, a useless response rate and simply daft conclusions. If two Access to Journalism students, say McLaughlin, B., and McLaughlin, B., on day-release from BBC Scotland, had come to me with this as a proposal for their group project, I’d have said in kindly tones:
‘Sorry lads, you’ll need to think again.’
As for my headline, I don’t have the evidence but my thesis is that they’d say:
Scottish football clubs think fnnn Reporting Scotland should stop fnnn wasting licence-payers’ money on fnnn stupid surveys?
Maybe there’d be more fnnns?