North Sea oil prices will boom as fracking faces three insurmountable barriers

160324104559-fracking-oil-drill-780x439

(c) cnn.com

Currently, massive supplies of shale oil from the USA are holding back a boom in prices for North Sea crude though the latter is nevertheless recovering to around $50 per barrel. However, the shale oil boom cannot last, for three reasons.

First, the supplies are actually quite limited:

Shale’s best days are coming to an end. U.S. shale oil production, which reshaped the global energy equation, will begin to wane in less than a decade as reserves are drawn down and well output decreases, the [US] Energy Department reported.’

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/Shale-s-best-days-are-coming-to-an-end-10942307.php

Second, fracking requires vast quantities of ‘frac sand’ to be pumped along with other materials into wells to break up shale rock and produce oil. Fracking needs a small uniform round form of sand that is not common, is rarely found anywhere near the oil basins, and it’s running out fast. Already, costs are climbing to levels that could easily send fracking from boom to bust even before the oil runs out:

‘I think people are looking at the potential demand numbers, and, for the first time, people are scared that there will not be enough sand to meet the demand…… The increased demand will push sand prices up by 60 percent, hitting the $40 per ton range over the next 18 months…..the real concern is the logistical challenges that come with moving high volumes of sand. Some producers are using a unit train – roughly 75 or more rail cars in a line – on each well…that presents some significant logistical challenges that could hamper production.’

http://www.businessinsider.com/morgan-stanley-forecasts-sand-demand-growth-2014-9?IR=T

Third, fracking kills workers and people living near the pipelines or wells. See this most recent example:
‘Two months after a Colorado home exploded near an Anadarko Petroleum Corp. well, the reverberations are still rattling the oil industry, driving down driller shares and raising fears of a regulatory backlash. The April 17 blast, which killed two people and injured a third, was followed a month later by a second deadly explosion at an Anadarko oil tank in the state.

https://www.oilandgaspeople.com/news/14435/blast-backlash-hangs-over-drillers-as-fractivists-seek-limits/

Activists in the USA have failed to stop fracking on safety grounds but this will matter little as compensation and insurance costs rise driving prices up and investors away.

So, one way or another the glut produced by US shale oil cannot last and we can look forward to lucrative increases in the export value of North Sea oil as Asian demand soars and we increasingly power our own economy with renewable energy. See:

All of Scotland could have been renewables-powered in May

25-year low in Scottish unemployment and increasing employment as rUK unemployment stagnates

shutterstock_125096129-390x285

Image: Unemployed/Employed via Shutterstock

In February – April 2017, Scotland’s unemployment rate fell again for the third month in a row and the gap with the rest of the UK has grown. Scotland’s rate in 4.0%, down from 4.4%. The rest of the UK figure remains at 4.6% as in the last quarter. This is the lowest rate since 2008. According to the Scottish Business News Network, the following positive comparisons can also be made:

  • Scotland’s employment rate increased by 0.3 percentage points over the quarter to 74.1% – the second highest employment rate out of the four UK nations [with London included in the English figures] – with the employment level rising by 14,000.
    • Over the year, Scotland’s employment rate increased by 0.9 percentage points, with the employment level rising by 44,000.
    • Scotland continued to outperform the UK on female employment rates (70.6% vs. 70.2%), and Scotland’s female unemployment rate was also lower than the UK’s (4.1% vs. 4.4%).
    • Scotland’s youth employment rate also outperformed the UK (57.1% vs. 54.1%), while Scotland’s youth unemployment rate was also lower than the UK’s (8.8% vs. 11.5%).

Note that with London excluded, Scotland has the highest employment rate of all four UK nations. Note also, the likely role of the Scottish Government’s £500 million Scottish Growth Scheme and £6 billion infrastructure plan in enabling this growth.

This is continuing evidence of the relative good health of the Scottish economy. Had it been otherwise, we can be sure the SNP-led government would be blamed so they must take some credit for this good news.

Wider evidence of growing health in the Scottish economy can be found in these links to earlier pieces:

‘Good news all round’ for Scottish Manufacturing

Scottish businesses showing signs of greater health than those in the rest of the UK

Dramatic gains in Scottish export sector and 15% overall growth in business sector

‘Fewer Scottish businesses failing in 2017’

‘North Sea oil output boost on horizon’ according to Reuters, only three months after we spotted it

https://news.gov.scot/news/unemployment-falls-2

https://www.ft.com/content/8d9fdd00-6b85-3100-b158-adbe3d76c7ff

https://sbnn.co.uk/2017/06/14/unemployment-lowest-rate-25-years/

Big increase in affordable housing supply down to Scottish Government investment

18819 itok=WAPWqZVZ

© Holyrood.com

There were 7 336 affordable homes completions, with Scottish Government funding, to end March 2017, 13% up on the previous year. There were 9 308 or an increase of 21% affordable houses started, with as you can see some still to be completed.

http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0052/00520664.pdf

More than £1.75 billion is being allocated over the next three years to councils to enable the building of a further 50 000 affordable homes by 2021. This will be the highest level of such activity since the 1980s.

https://news.gov.scot/news/gbp-1-75-billion-boost-for-investment-in-affordable-housing

This will also continue to be twice the level of such building per capita of that in England

SNP government spending on affordable housing to be more than twice, per head of population, than that of Tory government

I guess it may be more than twice once Theresa gets going with her cuts to fund Brexit.

Scottish Oil’s Confident Future: Three Reports

index

© oilofscotland.org

On one day, we have three convincing pieces of evidence that the North Sea’s 2016 losses were a temporary blip.

I’ve already reported on the massive finds west of Shetland and booming demand from Asia:

Estimates of Scotland’s oil reserves West of Shetland now massively increased to around 8 billion barrels! ‘A super-resource now on the cards.’

Scottish oil in new and much increased demand from Asia ‘like never before!’

Now, we have three reports released on the same day showing the industry’s growing confidence.

First, from the USA, prices climbed to $52 per barrel as:

‘Oil investors renewed their enthusiasm as a proposal by the world’s two biggest crude producers to extend output curbs into 2018 boosted confidence that other countries will follow suit.’

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/139497/oil-rally-finds-legs-backing-opec-cut-exntension-grows/

Second, The #Oil17: New World Order survey suggests some recovery in 2017 and the majority of their respondents expecting greater recovery in 2018 as prices head up to $70 per barrel. This reinforces the estimates made earlier in March when ‘data and analytics firm’, McKinsey, predicted that oil prices will rebalance at $60 to $70 per barrel.

https://www.energyvoice.com/marketinfo/136941/oil-re-balance-60-70-per-barrel-mckinsey-says/

https://www.energyvoice.com/events/otc/138142/future-oil-revealed-oil17-new-world-order/

Finally, Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce (AGCC)’s latest study of the mood of the offshore sector has found

  • 52% of operators believe prices have bottomed out and will begin to rise.
  • 38% of contractors, up from 12%, are more confident than they were six months ago

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/141799/video-confidence-levels-rise-north-dea/

Though good to see, I’d put these predictions at the conservative end of those being made elsewhere, months ago:

‘Global demand for oil could outdo the 10-year average in 2017.’ Why the SNP Government, the sector and hedge funds are all optimistic.

Kind of good news: Labour voters went home rather than vote Tory

Labour_for_Independence_logo.svg

(c) labourforindy.com

Yesterday’s Ashcroft Poll on SNP ‘defectors’ gave this:

 

To Labour                    60%

To Tories                     30%

To LibDems                 10%

 

So, those 60%, I think, were inspired by Corbyn’s progressive policies and thought the number one priority in this election was to beat the Tories. I don’t think they’re lost to the independence movement nor to the SNP as a government in Scotland, Holyrood or local authorities. I know they weakened the SNP vote and let the Tories in but that wasn’t their aim. With the best of intentions, they dearly wanted to do Theresa and they had begun to believe Jeremy might just do it. As for Kezia, she must know what she owes to Corbyn – her resignation.

For the others, hell mend them, as they look upon the disasters that will accrue from a weakened government negotiating Brexit having to give in to the EU on issues such as access to our fishing waters and having to work with the Dread Unionist Party. It’s time Ruth Davidson smelled the coffee and broke away from the UK Tory Party before the DUP guys get properly going. Here are some of their ‘ideas’, all a bit difficult for Ruth and Theresa:

Brexit and the Irish border

The DUP campaigned for Brexit but its manifesto argued for maintaining a “seamless and frictionless” border with Ireland. Objectives for the forthcoming Brexit negotiations included maintaining the Common Travel Area with the Republic and ease of trade throughout the EU.

Welfare spending

The manifesto retained the pensions “triple lock” and universal winter fuel allowance, both policies the Tories pledged to drop.

Opposition to same-sex marriage

While the party has changed radically since its beginnings, it has always maintained an opposition to socially liberal reforms which have taken place on the UK mainland.

Northern Ireland is the only remaining part of the UK where same-sex marriage is not legal after the DUP used a controversial veto mechanism to block any change to legislation. Senior figures in the party have called the issue a “red line” for power-sharing talks at Stormont.

Anti-abortion

The DUP has fought hard to halt an extension of abortion rights to Northern Ireland. Campaigners say their actions have forced thousands of women to travel elsewhere for terminations, or to rely on abortion pills bought online.

Climate denial

While climate change scepticism is not official party “policy”, the DUP has previously appointed a denier as environment minister in Northern Ireland, and it counts a number of creationists among its senior members.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/09/from-climate-denial-to-abortion-heres-six-dup-policies-you-should-know-about

Racial/Islamophobic Hate Crime in Scotland falls as it rises dramatically in England

Racial/Islamophobic crime in Scotland remains the most commonly reported hate crime. There were 3,349 charges reported in 2016-17, 10 percent fewer than in 2015-16, and the lowest number reported since 2003-04.

http://www.crownoffice.gov.uk/media-site-news-from-copfs/1559-hate-crime-in-scotland-2016-17-report-released

I’ve already attracted a bit of criticism for suggesting Scottish society and institutions including its policing strategies have promoted a more harmonious relationship with minority groups especially its Islamic community. Most controversially, I’ve suggested this might be making us safer from terrorism. Tempting fate, I know but the facts are there. See:

Scotland and Terrorism: Are we safer?

The above statistics were published just yesterday. There are, as far as I can see, no equivalent data for England as yet, but we’ve seen these headlines from 2016 and early 2017, thus predating the recent attacks by some time, which suggest Scottish society has, at least, more of the elements required to increase integration and reduce the negativity leading to terrorism:

Hate crimes rise by up to 100 per cent across England and Wales …

Hate crimes surge by 42% in England and Wales since Brexit result …

An increase in hate crimes in Manchester and London is the last few days was to be expected but the problem predates, England has much to learn from the Scottish context and needs to do so soon.

Why it’s good to be still ruled by London?

Inchgarth-land-615x346

© fwi.co.uk

Under the Common Agricultural Policy, The UK receives £190 million per annum to support struggling farmers. However, it is only the Scottish hill farmers average rate of income which brings the UK figure low enough to justify the payment.

So, what happens to the money? Agricultural policy is devolved so It goes to the struggling Scottish hill farmers, yes? No, the money is split between England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland even though only Scotland qualifies for it. Scotland gets only £30 million.

Scottish rural affairs secretary Fergus Ewing said: ‘

‘Farmers doing the same job in different parts of the UK do not presently receive comparable levels of payments for their hard work. This money rightly belongs to Scottish farmers and should be returned to them immediately.’

Each Scottish hill farmer is losing about £14 000 every year.

http://www.fwi.co.uk/news/scottish-hill-farmers-denied-190m-cap-money-says-ewing.htm

‘Putting the SNP’s latest landslide victory into historical perspective’ by Scot goes Pop

From the highly esteemed Scot goes Pop!
I don’t know about anyone else, but I punched the air when Stephen Gethins won the final Scottish seat by just two votes.  In spite of the recounts and the relentless optimism of SNP supporters on social media, I had almost given up on that one, because the Liberal Democrats were reported to be anything between one and three votes ahead, and recounts so rarely reverse the original result even when it’s that tight.  Psychologically it was an important win – it meant the SNP outperformed the original exit poll prediction (albeit only just), and probably outperformed Nicola Sturgeon’s own expectations even at quite an advanced stage of the night, when she told David Dimbleby she expected to finish with “a little over 30” seats.

It also means the SNP have taken roughly 60% of the seats in Scotland.  For the avoidance of doubt, a result like that can quite properly be called a landslide victory.  Here’s how it compares with various historical landslides at UK-wide level…

2017 (SNP landslide, Scotland only) :


SNP 59.3%

All other parties 40.7%

1945 (Attlee landslide) :


Labour 61.4%

All other parties 38.6%

1959 (Macmillan landslide) :


Conservatives 57.9%

All other parties 42.1%

1966 (Wilson landslide) :


Labour 57.8%

All other parties 42.2%

1983 (Thatcher landslide) :


Conservatives 61.1%

All other parties 38.9%

1987 (Thatcher landslide) :


Conservatives 57.8%

All other parties 42.2%

1997 (Blair landslide) :


Labour 63.4%

All other parties 36.6%

2001 (Blair landslide) :


Labour 62.5%

All other parties 37.5%

Even the SNP’s popular vote share of 37% compares favourably with some previous UK majority governments – it’s identical to the mandate received by the Tories in 2015, and on which they’ve been governing us over the last two years.  It’s also better than the 35% mandate on which Labour governed for a full five-year term between 2005 and 2010.

Apologies

WP_20170105_003

I should apologise for my undue optimism regarding the SNP’s chances in this election. I got it well wrong as the young folk say. I suspect many of the same young folk were charmed by Corbyn , abandoned the SNP and let the Tories in.  I don’t know if that’s a good guess or not. Alex Salmond said the same kind of thing. See also:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-2017-latest-news-labour-snp-young-people-voters-scotland-a7775561.html

So, I’m going take an optimistic view and say that those same voters who returned to Labour, young or old, in a desperate attempt to stop Theresa are still with the Yes campaign. I don’t really blame them in seeing only the Tory menace. I did the same in the 70s. Also, doesn’t this put the SNP in a stronger [balance of power] position in Westminster now than before?

I did actually express my enthusiasm for Jezza the Red some time ago:

Wishing I was English: Can SNP members follow JC?