(c) nen-press
See this, from the Scottish Government, yesterday:
‘A new amendment has been tabled to the Social Security (Scotland) Bill, which would remove any time qualification for people who are terminally ill. Current UK legislation for disability benefits and Universal Credit specifies that the definition of terminal illness is someone likely to die within 6 months. Social Security Minister Jeane Freeman has put forward an amendment to ensure that it will be entirely down to the clinical judgement of medical professionals to identify when a person is terminally ill, and this will ensure they can be automatically fast-tracked to the highest rate of disability benefits when they are devolved to the Scottish Parliament.’
https://news.gov.scot/news/no-time-limit-for-terminally-ill-people
It been some time since I considered the notion of Scotland, most of its politicians and most of its people being a bit different from the UK, many of its politicians and many of its people. The above, on its own means little but when you combine it with these below, I think it reveals a difference that makes a difference, and which adds to the case for independence:
More evidence of becoming a better nation as SNP ‘future-proof’ social security
Scotland first again, again and again: women on public boards?
Scotland takes nearly 26% of Syrian refugees settled in UK with only 8% of the UK population
Scots more likely to give to charities, to volunteer or to sponsor others
Scottish Government to fight alongside UN to defend disabled against Tory cuts.
Could Scotland end homelessness?
Scotland has lower poverty rates than England: JRF Excerpt 1
Wha’s like us? Lots of good folk in England, I know, but sadly not enough of them to counter the nasty Tory voters.
One thought on “Another little difference that tells us something: SNP to improve disability terms for terminally ill.”