Up to 400 new jobs for Shell field in North Sea. Lots of tax revenue too? No?

According to Insider:

‘Royal Dutch Shell has given the go-ahead for an expansion of the Penguins oil and gas field in the North Sea, its first major new project in the region in six years. The development will include the construction of a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel, which is expected to produce up to 45,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd). Shell said it will generate a profit even with oil prices below $40 per barrel, making it competitive against other offshore basins and most of North America’s shale production.’

It’s interesting that they use the $40pb rate, long surpassed. Brent prices burst through the $70pb figure last week and have been above $60pb for some time. See:

Second prediction that Scottish oil may rise beyond $70 per barrel to as much as $100 per barrel and that demand will grow over the next ten years.

Are they worried they might have to pay taxes if they acknowledge higher prices?

The Scottish Government Energy Minister said:

‘This significant investment by Shell and ExxonMobil is further evidence of rising confidence in the future of the region and it will offer a significant boost to communities across the north-east of Scotland, along with boosting the wider Scottish economy. We have always maintained there are significant opportunities remaining in the North Sea, even in the context of a low carbon transition, and that a strong and vibrant domestic offshore oil and gas industry will play an essential role in the future energy system we set out in our recently published energy strategy.’


Some readers may remember that Shell paid taxes to every other country they worked in but not to the UK, in 2016, so we’ll have to keep an eye on them. See this:


Surely the UK government didn’t let them off just to damage the case for Scottish independence? No, there must have been some good reason we colonials wouldn’t understand. See this for an explanation:

North Sea oil producers making massive profits as costs fall and prices rise. Are we taxing them, or might that damage the Unionist case?


4 thoughts on “Up to 400 new jobs for Shell field in North Sea. Lots of tax revenue too? No?

  1. Gavin.c.Barrie January 17, 2018 / 5:03 pm

    “The first duty of a director is to the shareholders”, and if shareholders are in position to influence a company’s obligations and tax liabilities, well, game on. Share value is enhanced, dividends enhanced. I wonder what proportion of people needing to visit food banks hold shares in Shell, in service providers to the English NHS, et al, are shareholders is these notable companies, and in position to influence said companies good fortune? Oh and it being reported that the City “got out” of Carrillion holdings… recently.


  2. Alan Gordon January 19, 2018 / 11:58 am

    Speaking with one of my brothers, who works in oil industry currently Houston and Brazil, he is expecting OPEC to open the valves a bit after next month, to bring the price down in order to keep pressure on US fracking and that it is more than likely Shell will have been offered a special ring fenced tax deal, to make the project look viable on paper to the investors.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s