Scotland’s world-first offshore wind farm electricity to cost less than half that of Hinkley Point C nuclear and has ability to withstand hurricanes.


A report in arsTECHNICA two days ago suggests Scotland’s offshore wind farms have massive potential to become our most economical and most efficient form of electricity generation in the coming years.

Hywind, 25km off Peterhead is the world’s first commercial floating offshore wind farm. It started sending electricity to the grid last October and had a 65% capacity over the last 3 months. Theoretically at 100% the farm would be sending 30Mw per minute though a range from 40 to 60% is more realistic.

The cost of wind power generally continues to fall dramatically as the cost of nuclear soars by around 35%. See:

Scottish electricity generation from renewables costs to fall to a quarter of nuclear costs by 2040

The survival of offshore farms during violent storms seems, intuitively a risk factor but the Hywind farm is equipped to withstand them. Last October’s Hurricane Ophelia brought wind speeds of 125 to160km/h and waves as high as 8.2m. According to the arsTECHNICA report:

‘Whilst the wind turbines shut down for safety reasons during the worst of these winds, they automatically resumed operation promptly afterwards,” Statoil wrote. “A pitch motion controller is integrated with the Hywind turbine’s control system and will adjust the angle of the turbine blades during heavy winds which mitigates excessive motions of the structure.’

Finally, returning to cost:

‘By 2030, Statoil says, it hopes to bring the cost of floating offshore wind down to €40-60 per MWh ($50-74 per MWh).’

In sharp contrast, Hinkley Point C (Costly?) was initially guaranteed £92.50 MWh but this is inflation-linked and is already closer to £100/MWh. This guarantee also stands for 35 years. A very bad deal indeed for the UK consumer but not for us given that we must surely break away long before 35 years have passed.


3 thoughts on “Scotland’s world-first offshore wind farm electricity to cost less than half that of Hinkley Point C nuclear and has ability to withstand hurricanes.

  1. Alan Gordon March 5, 2018 / 2:49 pm

    Very good. I’m glad to see the development of renewables like offshore wind, tide and wave. It will provide quality jobs in rural/coastal areas and provide us with a surplus, which will be needed should Hinkley not happen. Given the players in the Hinkley project, it not going ahead is a strong possibility, leaving a hole in the electrical supply budget. The French are grandstanding with a design they don’t have the steel quality for, by accounts they won’t cover costs and therefore might be happy when one of the others pull out, the Chinese have the money, are there for the investment guarantee and the technology (a mirror of high speed rail plan), they could invest in other places and just buy the technology and as for the last in the group 😨 lets judge them on brexit.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s